"None shall rule but the humble..."
--Ralph Waldo Emerson, "Boston Hymn," 1863.



with

The Game of the Year:

....Army at Navy
(Fans please note: the Swami, who, by protocol, must alternate sides each season, will be sitting on the Navy side this year.)


featuring:


..The Swami's "Top 16".


and
In the Swami's Spotlight... 

Navy-Marine Corps Memorial Stadium, Annapolis, MD

Into the belly of the Battleship.





This Week...
A significant week in the world of lacrosse...
The Playoff picture gets either more clear or muddier, depending on you point of view...
Princeton lost to Rutgers. This virtually eliminates Princeton from post-season play. The Ivy League is wide open this season, and probably all members, except Penn, can contend for its auto-bid, especially after the Yale upset of Brown. All this makes this weekend's Cornell at Dartmouth game highly significant. These are probably the best two teams in the Ivy League, with the winner destined to be the only undefeated team left in that conference. The early playoff bid advantage would have to belong to Cornell, which is deeper into its league schedule than is Dartmouth, but, at this point, that championship is be no means conclusory.

In other Ivy action, Yale, which graduated almost 45% of its scoring in 2004, upset Brown.

Denver upset Notre Dame in the Great Western Lacrosse League. The Swami predicted that Denver would win the GWLL before the season started. There has been surprisingly little comment about this excellent team on the lax boards. The Pioneers are playing great lacrosse now, just as they are entering the meat of their schedule.

Both upsetters, Denver and Yale, meet this Saturday in New Haven. There will be no Denver tailgate at that game, however. The Pioneers have to hit the road to be in Charlottesville the very next day for their contest against Virginia. On the road or not, the Swami likes Denver, and thinks the Pioneers could bring a surprise or two to C'ville.

Army held off Bucknell, to rise to the pinnacle of the Patriot League, where it is undefeated. And Navy came through against Maryland, assuring the public of a dynamite contest between the two this weekend.

Delaware continues its inconsistent play, upsetting Towson decisively, only to later lose to Hofstra by ten goals. The Blue Men need to get it together soon if they want to see any extended action next month.

At Villanova Stadium in Philadelphia, the Wildcats took Towson to four overtimes before Tiger Jonathan Engleke ended the game in favor of the visitors. The box score was not available at press time, but the Swami notes that Towson coach Tony Seaman was quoted as saying this was a game that "nobody deserved to lose."


The biggest Army-Navy game in decades is about to happen...
It's been 23 years since the Army-Navy game featured such highly ranked teams...
On April 14, 1982, #6 Navy visited #3 Army and came away from West Point with a dramatic (12-11) overtime victory. It's been that long since these two teams have met with each so highly ranked. Last year both squads were in the Top Ten, but this year, both have a chance to be Final Four teams.

This is also a bonus game. Whichever team wins in Annapolis this Saturday will host the Patriot League Tournament--a decided advantage for the automatic playoff invitation that awaits the victor.

But this year, for only the second time in more than a decade, Navy is the underdog. And Army, which has not had a win in this series since 1997, has overcome early season injuries and is playing its best lacrosse of the year, having just won its ninth game in a row. Army lost only at Syracuse this season, and that occurred when it was missing an entire midfield. Despite that handicap, that game was tied midway through the third quarter.

Last week, in front of 14,000+ emotionally exhausted fans, the Mids achieved their biggest win of the season against Maryland--but not without accomplishing it in true Navy style--blowing a third quarter three goal lead, tying the game with only two minutes left of the clock and, with a mere 14 seconds remaining, scoring the game winner after a goal so improbable that the scorer had to ask, "How in the world did that shot go in"?

So far there is no rain forecast for Saturday, and the field is in horrible condition, which suits this game just fine.

You never know which team will win an Army-Navy game. There have been many upsets over the years. One of the most famous happened in 1963. Navy had an 18 game winning streak on the line, and was 8-0 entering its last game of the year. A win over an Army squad that had lost to three teams that Navy had beaten badly was all the Mids needed to finish their second consecutive undefeated season. But that didn't happen.

It's always been a mystery as to how Army won that game. But, in a "This Week" exclusive, former Army attackman Jack Jannarone and former Army coach Ace Adams tell what it was like to be on the field in Annapolis on the afternoon of June 5, 1963. Don't miss this only account of that game by these former participants.



This Week in Women's Lacrosse...
#2 Duke has a familiar ring in Chixlax too...
There was more than one #1 vs. #2 going on last week. In addition to the Duke men at Hopkins. The Duke women, also #2, visited #1 Northwestern. Did they do any better? Miss C. C. Ryan reports from Evanston, Illinois, where she is on the road with the Northwestern women's team.


Why Army-Navy is the most important lacrosse game every year...
Will Network Television pick up lacrosse anytime soon?...
Almost every lacrosse board contains statements with wild claims about the growth of lacrosse. Some are true, but many are not. And all have to be put into proper context.

There are about 7,000,000 sanctioned high school athletes in the US--that's over 50% of the high school student population. Lacrosse has never been among the top ten high school sports in terms of either programs or participation. No doubt lacrosse is growing, but what does that mean?

Of those 7,000,000 high school athletes (4,000,000 males, 3,000,000 females), 96,000 play lacrosse (53,000 males, 43,000 females). How big is that? Well, it's less than a quarter of the number that play volleyball (436,000), less than one-tenth of the number that play basketball (1,002,000), and is less than the number that participate in track and field. Oh, and that's just indoor track and field--the outdoor version attracts ten times as many participants. There are more girls' field hockey programs than lacrosse programs. And ice hockey, played primarily in a few northern states, has more boys' programs nationally than does lacrosse. Among girls, amazingly, ice hockey is twice as popular as lacrosse. And, of course, lacrosse is dwarfed by football and baseball.

So far as growth rate is concerned, all sports that start small grow faster. When you go from one to two, you grow 100%. When you go from 100 to 110, you only grow 10%. Lacrosse may have impressive growth rates in that sense, but it's coming from a base where it was once almost exclusively played in New York and Maryland.

Which high school sports are growing at the fastest rates? Not lacrosse. It hasn't even penetrated half the 50 states yet. Try bowling, swimming and diving, and, yes, soccer.

That last one hurts. Soccer. We all know that soccer is the model most sports try to follow when attempting to build youth participation. No sport has taken over the playing fields of America faster and more pervasively than has soccer in such a short period of time. Soccer has outgrown lacrosse by miles, by almost any measure. But what does that mean? If soccer is so popular in America, why do all professional soccer leagues seem to fail before the ink on their season tickets dry? Well, almost. Indoor soccer has succeeded--to a degree. But is soccer really popular in a spectator sense? Soccer attendance figures, divided by the number of participants, have to be miniscule. When is the last time you saw (outdoor) soccer from America on television? Or an NCAA Division I contest? Does that tell you something? No sport has been given more chances at the professional level and failed so many times as soccer has in the U.S. Hopkins students in the 1960's used to walk down 33rd Street to watch the Baltimore Bays play at Memorial Stadium. That was about 14 professional soccer teams ago.

Sports success in America is defined by the viewing audience. And network TV is the largest part of the audience for the most popular sports in this country. That's not going to change. The American Football League succeeded because CBS had the NFL contract and NBC did not. NBC wanted to show football on Sundays, so they picked up the AFL, and the rest is history. When the USFL (United States Football League) could not get a network TV deal, it folded, just like the WFL (World Football League).

College lacrosse is now shown occasionally on television due to the proliferation of cable and satellite stations that do not need large audiences to break even. Most colleges allow their games to be broadcast without compensation. But for lacrosse to really gain in popularity, it needs the money that only huge network TV audiences offer. Will that ever happen?

It already did. Once. CBS broadcast the NCAA Championship game more than 15 years ago. It was an abysmal flop. No one watched it.

Which brings the Swami to the point. Yes, lacrosse has grown, but not all over the country. For lacrosse to be watched nationally, the next network televised game will have to attract viewers that do not see the game regularly, if at all. What kind of game will that be? Johns Hopkins at Hofstra? That's almost always a good game, but will people in Oregon or Florida or Texas watch it? Not likely. Readers of this publication might know that these are great lacrosse programs, but the rest of the country couldn't tell you in which states these schools are located.

Let's face facts, right now there is more bicycling on television than lacrosse. And there are only 57 Division I men's lacrosse teams--more or less the same number there have ever been. With those figures, it's obvious that regardless of meaningless statistical growth rates spouted off by the Lacrosse Establishment, this sport needs a major shot in the arm.

If you were sitting in Texas or Florida scanning a TV schedule and noticed that Johns Hopkins was playing lacrosse at Hofstra, would you think of that as a major game? Or some sort of minor athletic event played by two colleges with teams you had never heard of? How many viewers from those states would watch? Probably not many. That's too bad. If they watched, they might enjoy it and watch again. Then you're talking real revenues for college lacrosse programs, and the explosion of the sport.

Just look at football. Army and Navy raked in $20 million from the cities of Philadelphia and Baltimore just to play there from 2004-2008--and that's not TV revenues. The Army-Navy football classic is no longer merely a big college football game, but rather a mini-Super Bowl with attendant festivities. When the Mids played in the Emerald Bowl at SBC Stadium in California last year, they had advance ticket sales of 20,000. Opponent New Mexico managed less than 4,000. That's why the Las Vegas Sun said the Las Vegas Bowl would have been more successful if it had invited Navy rather than UCLA--despite the fact that UCLA is a major football power located only four hours away.

Last year, about 1,000,000 people watched the NCAA Division I lacrosse championship on ESPN. Placed in context, about 6,000,000 viewers watch NBC's Today Show each morning during the week. And about 15,000,000 watch an average NFL game (the Super Bowl draws over 150,000,000 viewers).

The week after this season's Army-Navy game, CBS will air the National Cheer Association's National Championship at 2:00 PM--and it's not even live. What does that tell you about how starved the networks are for sports that have national, and not just regional, appeal?

Now, this story might be unlikely, but it's certainly not fantasy. Let's say that two good Army and Navy lacrosse teams make it through the playoffs and into the National Championship in Philadelphia. The contest would take place in the same stadium where the Army-Navy Football classic is played. The service academies' athletic departments know the drill for the big games in Philadelphia, as do the fans. They're already familiar with the media arrangements, publicity, logistics, lodging, and security.

Any Army-Navy championship lacrosse match up would sell out to standing room only. ESPN, which is owned by ABC, may be able to step the game up to a network broadcast.

Under those circumstances, would the President want people to say he didn't have enough time to attend a game between two institutions whose recent graduates are now in combat? Or do you think politicians are TV shy?

Would all those people Texas and Florida watch this game? You had better believe it.

The minute Marine One sets down on a helipad in South Philly and the Commander-in Chief steps off to view a lax contest, this sport enters a new era.

It's Army and Navy that can put this sport on network TV. And network TV can supply the revenues to change lacrosse forever. Once college athletic departments get a whiff of some network TV cash, you've suddenly got a lot of new programs.

Ironically, it is often those who stand to benefit from this the most--the mainstream lacrosse media, who insist that Army-Navy is not as worthy as Hopkins-Princeton-Syracuse-Virginia, etc.

But they've got it backwards.

The Army-Navy game is college lacrosse's launching pad into major media. That's why it's the most important game of the year--every year. And that's why it deserves the support of the entire lacrosse community.


Lee Dingman on this week's contest...
Army's former leading scorer analyzes the game...
Note: Lee Dingman (USMA '00) returned from a tour in Iraq last year with the 101st Airborne...
Academy Fans…

That time of year is upon us where the fields of friendly strife anxiously await the Army-Navy Lacrosse Game.

The NCAA's all-time Division I wins leader, coach Jack Emmer takes his #4 Black Nights against 2004 Coach of the Year, Richie Meade and his #6 Naval Academy Midshipmen.

This game has so many things riding on it, I'm not sure where to begin. First, both teams are in the top 10, and a win for Navy will increase their rank in the top 10, while a win for Army leaves them at a likely #4. Second, the Patriot League tournament: Navy needs to beat Army, and for Colgate to beat Bucknell on 19 April, to host the Patriot League Tournament. Army needs only to beat Navy for the home field advantage. Finally a loss for Navy may knock them out of the top 10 and deflate the much needed momentum to carry them into a certain battle against Johns Hopkins the following Saturday.

The Usual Suspects:

ARMY

Attack-Walker, Wagner, Scheel….103 combined points

Middies-Obringer, Green, Bokmeyer, Larsen, Couch & Couch…43 combined points

Defense & Goal-Doerr, Hansinger, Luyster and Fullerton… Goals Against Avg 6.98

NAVY

Attack-Birsner, Horn, Mirabito…72 combined points

Middies-Gill, Looney & Looney, Wallin, Wallace, Pieczonka…67 combined points

Defense & Goal-Hendler, Felber, Reilley, Dow and Russell…Goals Against Avg 5.68

Some analysis:

A quick look reveals that Army's heavy scoring comes from the attack, while Navy shows a little more balanced approach. That being said, Army has probably the strongest attack corps and defense it has had in years, while Navy's midfield remained strong from the 2004 season. Army's defense is the wild card this season. While Army has always prided itself on tough, physical defense, rarely has this team kept its goals against average this low. I believe the coaching staff at West Point finally made the defense schemes click and success has followed. Navy has continually posted one of the lowest GAAs each of the past 5 years and Army's shooters up front must work hard to beat this defense and goalie.

Bottom line:

I was on the team in 1997, the last time Army won this game. My pick is for Army to win, 9-8.

The Black Knights currently hold the longest active win streak in Division I with nine, and will look to make it number ten "This Week."



Letters to the Editor

"This Week" will be accepting and publishing letters to the editor in next week's edition. If you would like to comment about the content of this (or any other) issue, or have anything else you would like to say, please direct your email to editor@laxswami.com. If you would like to comment without publication, please note that on your email. Thank you.





1963...
Was this the biggest upset of the series ever?...
Ex-Army attackman Jack Jannarone (USMA '65) tells the story of an 11-9 Army victory...
The question before me is how did the 1963 Army team which had lost to Hopkins, Maryland and the University of Baltimore, beat an undefeated Navy team which had beaten each of those schools easily and was on its way to a national championship?

NAVY
1963 COMMON OPPONENT
ARMY
W 17-9
University of Maryland
L 11-6
W 10-5
Johns Hopkins
L 10-9
W 19-7
University of Baltimore
L 11-9


I probably would not have been able to give a good answer to that question in 1963, and now, 42 years later, with memories fading, I probably will do worse, but here goes anyway.

First of all you have to put this in context. This was an Army-Navy game so, as in any sport from lacrosse to softball, throw out the crystal ball because anything can happen. There is no need to motivate anyone on either team because the motivation is already there. Just say the magic words "Army-Navy" and two teams will be on the field ready to do battle. Second, in spite of our record, I think that we had a competitive team in 1963. We played Hopkins even for 59 minutes and 59 seconds, losing on a last second one man effort by Hopkins’ best attackman. I can't even remember the Maryland game. They must have been the better team that day. I do remember our next to last game against the University of Baltimore. Quite frankly, we were flat that day. We just couldn't get going against a team that we should have beaten. But I still maintain that we had a good team.

At one end of the field we had Norm Webb in the goal. Norm was the most unlikely looking goalie that I have ever seen. He certainly would not get many style points from the judges, but he had an uncanny ability to anticipate a shot and, by some sort of magic, put his stick or some part of his body (real goalies didn't wear chest pads back then) between the ball and the goal. He was the best that I have ever seen. At the other end of the field we had Tommy Sheckells playing attack. Tommy was coming into his own as a sophomore following a season ending knee injury on the freshmen team the year before. Playing just three years on the varsity and averaging onlly 11 games a season, he would eventually set a West Point career assist record that stayed on the books for over 35 years. So, if we could get the ball up field from Norm Webb to Tommy Sheckells, we could play with any team of that era.

Speaking of that era, we should note that the game of lacrosse was different in several respects back then. For starters, we played with wooden sticks. Not only were they heavier than today's high tech marvels, they were also asymmetric which gave a slightly different balance and feel. The passing, catching, and face dodging skills which we see today just weren't possible with wooden sticks, especially for the long sticks. The defense stick had a bigger head and thicker shaft, meaning that it was a handful even for the big guys who carried it. The flip side was that a defenseman could put some serious lumber on any one who came within six feet of him. No flexible plastic head on the end of a lightweight shaft here. I'm talking about taking a shot from what felt like a long ax handle. Also, this was before what I call the lacrosse explosion. There were simply not that many high schools that offered lacrosse, so there were not that many lacrosse players entering college each year and there were not that many colleges with lacrosse programs. As a result, both Army and Navy, which both had a long tradition of playing lacrosse, were able to recruit, perhaps not as many top players as the other top lacrosse schools, but they were able to recruit enough experienced players to remain competitive.

Furthermore, back then the NCAA did not allow freshmen to play on the varsity. That meant that we had to see the other teams really good guys for only three years instead of four. For the first year we had freshmen teams. A good coach, and we had one of the best at West Point in Ace Adams, could take a kid who had never seen a lacrosse stick in his life, but who had speed or size or athleticism or all of the above and turn him into a varsity lacrosse player at the top level. Heck, an awful lot of our defensemen were football players looking for something to do (or someone to hit) in the spring time. Finesse with the big stick was not in the job description. Being big, strong, and determined not to let anyone get around you was. What I am trying to say is that Coach Adams could take a few guys who had lacrosse sticks in their cradle and team them up with good athletes with no experience at all and play at the national championship level. I don't think that formula would be successful today because there are so many good players coming out of high school now. The other big difference in college lacrosse was that it was a spring game played by guys in shorts because college graduation was held in June back in the good old days. There was none of this practice in snow and sub-zero temperatures in January for a season opener in February for us. The first game for us usually was at the end of March, and the heart of the season was in May. Now the season is over in early May, except for the teams that make the tournament. Back then the Army-Navy game was always our last game of the season played in June, just a day or two before graduation. For our seniors, playing both the last game of their college career and against Navy, the motivation was huge.

Returning to my earlier comments, in 1963, we had skill guys, speed guys and big guys to make us competitive, but on paper Navy looked better. I don't remember that Coach Adams did anything unusual in practice the week before the game except that he put me on the extra man offense, perhaps to create a new look after the University of Baltimore debacle. At the time I was on the second string attack and I didn't have a lot going for me, but I made up for a lack of size with a lack of speed. About the only thing that I did have was a left hand shot which was fairly unusual in the wooden stick days. I could also go right handed, which was even more unusual.

Game day turned out to be a beautiful June day in Annapolis. We played in the football stadium before the largest crowd that I had ever seen at a lacrosse game. We even had a good contingent of Army fans. I was a 3rd class cadet (sophomore) on the field for my first Army-Navy game. Even if I was a scrub with little chance of getting in the game, I felt privileged just to be there.

Sometime in the first half we went man up, and I got into the game. The ball worked around to the midfield on the goalie's left side, and I saw that Timmy Vogel was getting ready to shoot, so I slid over to the left side of the crease to screen the goalie while facing Tim and carrying my stick low on my left side. The Bird had a cannon for a shot and he fired a hard bouncer just by my left ankle. The Navy goalie got a piece of it, but the ball popped out right on to the back side of my stick. Since my back was still to the goal, I shoveled it right back at him. The next thing I knew the ref was signaling a goal. It was ugly, but it was in. Hey, a goal is a goal, especially for a scrub in his first Army-Navy game. So that was my minor contribution to the 1963 Army-Navy game. Was it coaching genius for Coach Adams to stick a left hander into the game? I don't know, but I will always be thankful for his confidence in me that day. Did that goal determine the outcome of the game? Not likely. We were playing good, solid lacrosse--the kind of game that we were capable of playing the week before against the University of Baltimore.

For the rest of the game I was 10 feet off the ground, so I don't remember much more. I do remember that in the second half one of our midfielders, Roy Buckner, put a huge hit on a Navy football player turned defenseman during a clear. Even though out weighed by 40 or 50 pounds, Roy stopped him dead in his tracks. The momentum of the game clearly swung over to us at that point, and Navy was tentative on their clears for the rest of the game. The only other thing that I remember about that day was jumping off or being thrown off a dock into the bay with the rest of the team and making a lot of noise as only young men can do. Now there is another reason to play in June. The water was warm!

In retrospect, the 1963 Army-Navy game was the highlight of my college lacrosse career. The really good players score lots of goals. When you score only a few, but one of those was against Navy in Annapolis on a beautiful day in June, it sticks with you forever.

But remember too, that Army-Navy, like any good rivalry, is a never-ending cycle. While we were a very happy bunch of cadets laughing and splashing in the Chesapeake Bay that beautiful day, we had no idea that there was a Navy plebe in the stands named Jimmy Lewis, and that he would dominate us and the lacrosse world for the next three years.
--Jack Jannarone (USMA, 1965)


Ex-Army coach "Ace" Adams, comments on the 1963 game...
Preparation in those days was an entirely different affair...the "Shadow" knows...
I was very fortunate to be associated with such outstanding youngsters like Jack Jannarone.

The loss to Baltimore U. was a stunner. I always felt that the approaching exams had affected the team that day, but then Navy brought out the best in our boys. I remember that Tom Sheckells scored 5 goals and that Tim Vogel intercepted a Dennis Wedekind clearing pass at the midline and shot the ball from that point before Dennis could get back in the goal. Norm Webb and the defense did a great job in keeping the Midshipmen in check. There is just something special about Army and Navy.

Another great asset in those days was the work of our scout, Lee Horowitz. Lee was a great coach at Southern High School and scouted Maryland and Navy for both Bob Scott at Johns Hopkins and for me at West Point. He would not scout Army for Bob nor JHU for me. He was a great person and friend to both of us.

Videos were not available then, so scouting reports were valuable. Lee hit upon sending me audio tapes in lieu of pages upon pages of notes. I would play those to the team early in the week. Lee had a deep, resonant voice and we would sit in a darkened room and listen. None of our players knew him, but they called him "The Shadow."

In '63, I remember him saying "This is the fastest team you will have seen, but fortunately, you are not competing in a track meet."

They don't come better than people like Lee and Bob Scott, or the men of Army and Navy.
--Jim ("Ace") Adams, Army coach (Swami's note: coach Adams won four National Championships with Army in 1958, 1959, 1961, and 1969, before moving on to UVA).


Army and Navy players speak out on the game...
A letter from West Point...
There are few privileges in sports greater than playing in an Army-Navy game. What makes this game so special is the competition between teams of hard working, dedicated, and talented young men. Both teams are strong not because they have the best individuals but because they are the tightest teams out there. Look at the rosters and you will find players who were not big recruits making huge impacts; they made the best of what they had when they arrived at the college level. Then they came together as a team and that made them even better. I know here at Army this is the tightest team that I have ever played on. I would do anything for my teammates. Both teams show faith in more people, playing deeper into their rosters in big game situations, than anyone else we play. This faith in one another gives every player the belief that if he works hard he will play.

In addition to this respect and faith in teammates, there is a great respect for the opponent. Consequently, there is no more intensely fought game in college lacrosse than the game between these two teams.

Currently, the coaches rank us fourth and Navy sixth, but these rankings mean nothing this week. There is no game either team wants to win more than this game.

In this game, both teams bring their best game, and every player leaves everything on the field. No Army or Navy team hands this game to their opponent; the winners must win it. Because of this, the week of practice before the big game is the most intense of the season here at Army as the coaches attempt to prepare us for the game's intensity. Usually this intensity, and not tricks or gimmicks, wins the game. Usually the team that plays the best solid fundamental lacrosse wins, not crazy schemes.

Many people have asked me why I root for Navy when we're not playing them. In other big rivalries, players root against their rival the rest of the season. This is not so in the case of Army-Navy. Last year on Army's Graduation Day our whole team watched the Navy-Princeton National Semifinal together at our team's post graduation reception and pinning ceremony for our new graduates. The cheering was for Navy. They even postponed the new grads' pinning until half time. Two days later, several teammates and I detoured through Baltimore on our way to our summer training assignments to catch the National Championship game.

I doubt there was anyone else in the stands rooting harder for Navy than we were. Why is this? I think it is because there is more respect for our opponents than in other rivalries. When the game is over, we all live similar lives of unceasing demands and deprivation. And we will be entering the same profession of arms. Thus, though I don't deny a little rivalry between services, we will all be on the same team in the near future (for me, forty-six and a butt days as I write this).

This year seems to be an Army-Navy game with more intrigue than usual. An Alumni game the night before brings back players from years past, competing and cooperating just as they did when they played. I sure wish I could attend that game and the post game party, but we will have other business. I can only hope that they have as much fun on Friday as I will on Saturday.

Finally, both teams will have many former players and teammates in harm's way defending this country while the two games take place. I think that I speak for Navy as well when I say that we play a large part of this game for them. Our thoughts and prayers go out to them and we know that they will be waiting anxiously for the results.


A letter from Annapolis...
Every year the Army/ Navy game is as intense as the national championship. Bodies go flying and every player on either team is willing to harm themselves to deliver a hit.

There is simply nothing that matches the intensity of playing Army. It’s a gut check to play against someone that you know will never give up and come back at you until the whistle blows.

When we were not in the tournament and Army was, I rooted for West Point. I wanted them to beat Hopkins because I dislike Hopkins.

When Army and Navy play against each other we play with a sort of hate because every eye we care about is on us, and we can’t let each other down, but I don’t really hate Army. I don’t ever want to see an Army team have success against a Navy team, but I hope they beat up on everyone else. Maybe because I know if we both win out, then we get to play each other again.

This year people are talking about the tournament implications of this game (both NCAA and Patriot League). It seems like everyone outside of the academy is excited because of how much the A/N game means this year.

I am here to tell you that there is no difference between this year and any other year as far as we are concerned. The game has already reached the limit. It cannot be any more important, tensions and emotions will never run higher than in any Army-Navy game.

For us, it’s as big as the national championship, and we get to play in it every year.


The Army-Navy Alumni Game is this Friday evening at Rip Miller Field in Annapolis...
This year Team Swami will be covering the Army-Navy game with all of its personnel. There will be no other game coverage this weekend, with the exception of Miss C. C. Ryan, who is on the road with the Northwestern Women's team. In addition to the Division I Army-Navy game at Navy-Marine Corps Memorial Stadium at noon on Saturday, April 16th, we will all be at the Army-Navy Alumni Game the evening of Friday, April 15th at Rip Miller Field (7:00 PM) on the yard at the Naval Academy in Annapolis. This is the first such game of its kind. So far, it looks like there will be two squads of about 75 players each. Former Army coaches Ace Adams and Dick Edell will be present to put the players back in shape. Service academy lacrosse alumni can contact the Swami for further information if they would like to play. This is a worthwhile event, plus you will get to meet the Swami, Miss Bunny Bimbette, Miss Venus Lee, and the fabulous Swamiettes, who will all be in personal attendance. Miss Ryan, as noted, is on the road. The big question is: Will we get to see Charlie Guy play? He was captain of Navy's 1946 team, and, believe it or not, played on a senior team at the Vail shoot-out only about five years ago.


Senior player duty assignments...
Army:
Jeff Auer--Infantry
E. J. Behrendt--Air Defense Artillery
Geoff Costa--Field Artillery
Chris Couch--Infantry
Jake Couch--Armor
Matt Darak--Military Intelligence
Vic DeMouth--Field Artillery
Nick Doerr--Field Artillery
Matt Ellement--Infantry
Brandt Germann--Combat Engineering
Brian Green--Aviation
Ben Harrow--Infantry
Chris Larsen--Infantry
Eric Mineo--Infantry
Jim Wagner--Air Defense Artillery
Navy:
Seth DiNola--Naval Aviation
Mike Felber--Naval Aviation
Graham Gill--Naval Aviation
Matt Hage--Surface Warfare
Dan Harris--Naval Aviation
Karl Hassenfratz--Submarine Service
Mitch Hendler--Surface Warfare
Ben Horn--Naval Aviation
Clipper Lennon--Naval Aviation
Matt Meehan--Surface Warfare
Dwyane Osgood--Marine Corps Aviation
Chris Pieczonka--Surface Warfare
Pat Reilly--Surface Warfare
Jim Sullivan--Naval Aviation


Miss Venus Lee comments...
Face-offs...
The Swami and I occasionally compare game notes. Usually only individual statistics stand out. This year we have noticed a trend that seems to be taking place across all games and with all teams. It involves the fact that more face-offs are being won by the wings than ever since we have been keeping notes. Each week we record every face-off of each game we attend and mark in detail how the draws are won. There is no doubt about it, the new faceoff rule is resulting in more wing involvement than ever before.

In last week's Maryland-Navy game, the face-offs break down this way: Navy won 5 faceoffs cleanly, Maryland won 2 faceoffs cleanly, Navy won 4 faceoffs on procedural calls, Maryland won zero faceoffs on procedural calls. Maryland's wings won 6 faceoffs and Navy's wings won 3 faceoffs. In total, then, 45% of all faceoffs were decided by wing play.

You can draw your own conclusions, but, to me, this means the center midfielders have to make adjustments, and that face-off statistics can no longer be attributed primarily to the center midfielders, as they have in the past.







Last Week...
In Annapolis at Navy-Marine Corps Memorial Stadium...
The Swami reports: Navy does it again...the roller coaster starts before everyone gets strapped in...
The Mids blow a three goal third quarter lead, only to tie the game with 2 minutes left on the clock, then win it on a miracle goal in the final 14 seconds...
It was a little after 9:15 PM. Navy's Graham Gill was laying on his back in the middle of the field staring up at the darkened sky. The scoreboard clock showed two minutes left to play. Gill had just been knocked to the ground as he scored the game tying goal for Navy from an angle that was so totally impossible it caused Maryland goaltender Harry Alford to do a double-take when he looked in the net. As teammate Ben Horn helped him to his feet, Gill asked, "How in the world did that shot go in?"

Now, with just 20 seconds left, it appeared that this game was headed for overtime, and Navy's hoped for game-winning play, called a minute earlier during a time out, had been quashed by Maryland's determined defenders. The Terrapins had successfully robbed Gill of his most potent weapon--his left-handed shot, all evening. Gill did manage one southpaw goal in the first quarter, but it was against Maryland's zone on EMO. At the two minute mark, Gill was forced to go to his right hand to slide the ball into the goal.

As the clock ticked relentlessly, a few passes by Navy's attack placed the ball, once again, in Gill's stick. This time, he cut to the goal, shook two defenders, switched righty for a second time and scored the game winner with 14 seconds left.

The most exciting team in lacrosse had done it again--this time taking 14,000 fans on a wild ride in the process.

Graham Gill was not exactly a heavily recruited high school player. This may possibly be a result of his having attended a high school that did not have a lacrosse program.

What college could possibly want anyone like that?

Why, Navy, of course.

Last year Navy's top scoring midfielder was from Memphis, Tennessee. This year, Navy has two players from Texas, a midfielder from Bloomfield Hills, Michigan who has a winning face-off percentage of .688, and a starting attackman from Mill Valley, California. The Mids' leading 2005 scorer, going into this game, is a freshman.

This is a team that rotated four long stick midfielders earlier this season in a win over North Carolina, regularly uses 30 players a game (28 against Maryland last Friday), carries 24 midfielders on its roster, and threw 39 players into the fray against Army last year.

Compare that with Duke and Johns Hopkins, which, in a game last Friday that went into double-overtime, used only nine substitutes each.

Navy looked powerful in its victory over North Carolina, controlling all aspects of the game. Then, only seven days later, the Mids dropped a match to Bucknell. Later, Navy was obliterated by Georgetown in Annapolis. Georgetown had earlier been blown off the field by Maryland in a 13-6 rout. Then Navy beat Maryland.

Maybe now you get the picture. This is skilled team of unlikely players with excellent coaching. As recent history would indicate, Navy is also unpredictable, except for one thing: this team never quits. The Mids play until they are dragged off the field. Last Friday's effort was vintage Navy.

The sun was setting over Annapolis for this 7:00 PM start when David Tamberrino won the opening face-off for Maryland. Both teams needed some time to settle down, as is the case whenever these two long-time rivals meet.

Both teams took ten shots before anything fell. But Navy was showing that it had shaken its tendency, so evident when Georgetown visited Annapolis last week, to turn the ball over. The Mids were valuing possessions. When Navy goalie Matt Russell picked up a ground ball at 10:17, Navy maintained ball control for over five minutes, peppering Maryland's goal with six shots in the process. None of them hit their intended mark, and it was obvious Navy was shooting high on Alford, because several of them sailed over the top of the crossbar.

At 4:44 of the first period, Maryland's Bill McGlone eluded his long stick defender, got a step on the short stick that picked him up, dodged to the goal and bounced in a score from the left side.

When Maryland was flagged for holding at 4:09, Navy showed a new-look extra man offense. The Swami found it difficult to diagnose, but no longer was Navy wasting a man by permanently stationing him behind the goal (the "Towson Syndrome"), there were two players on either side of the goal who would sometimes invert, and sometimes come out front. This formation would net Navy an EMO percentage of .800 on the night. And, since Maryland provided the Mids with five penalty opportunities, it put four goals on Navy's side of the scoreboard. Before the night ended, it was obvious that Navy's offensive coordinator, John Tillman, had done his job preparing the team in a number of areas.

On this play, the ball worked its way around to Graham Gill, who tied the game with his only left-handed goal of the contest on a hard sidewinder from about 10 yards out at 3:53.

So far, so good for Navy. Sustained possessions and successful EMO were all missing last week. But would Navy's quick-strike offense return?

The fans got their answer just seconds later as the Iceman, Chris Pieczonka, swiped the face-off, ran straight to the goal, then shuttled the ball along the ground to an open Ben Horn, who fired a hard one past Alford at 3:45.

Not two minutes into the second quarter, Maryland's Xander Ritz tied the game on an unassisted goal from close in.

Navy took a time out to re-group. Two minutes later, however, Maryland went up 3-2 on a burnball from Joe Walters. It was a hard sidearm shot on a feed from Brendan Healy who saw Walters open on the side, about eight yards out. Maryland had obtained possession seconds earlier by breaking a Navy clear.

In the meantime, Navy's man-down unit was turning in a heroic performance. Maryland was able to get off only a single shot during both of Navy's first two penalties.

But, when Maryland was flagged at 4:06, Navy put on a show for the fans. Steve Looney insinuated his way deep into the Maryland defense, four yards in front of the goal. He was too tempting a target for Ben Horn to overlook. Horn fed the ball to Looney high. Then, on one of the most unusual goals of the evening, Looney one-timed a soft rainbow lob over Alford's head and into the net. It was picture perfect, and totally unexpected. The game was now tied again, at 3-3.

The Swami totalled up his stats at the half. They were pretty even. Maryland had a shot advantage (19-14), but many were not on goal. Only Navy's EMO really stood out. Would the Mids be able to continue this?

This, of course, is only anecdotal, but when Navy came out of the locker room, the team looked animated. There was a little extra bounce in the Mids' step.

That would carry onto the field. Maryland was hit with an immediate penalty, and Navy scored.

This time it was Jon Birsner feeding Ben Horn off a busted first Navy attempt. Horn side armed it in from the right.

Two minutes later, Steve Looney would grab his second goal of the game on an unassisted high left-hander from the left side.

Maryland held Navy scoreless for the next six minutes until Tommy Wallin beat his man badly and uncorked a bouncer into Maryland's goal. This sent Navy up, 6-3.

Navy was on a four goal run and threatening to break the game open.

There were plenty of Maryland fans at this game, but the attendance of 14,124 is almost half the population of the City of Annapolis. Most of the people in the seats were Navy supporters. And they all knew one thing: when Navy goes on a four goal run, it is always an omen. The problem is, with the Midshipmen, one never knows in advance what the omen may portend.

In this case it was a three goal run for Maryland that enabled the Terps to tie the game.

Two carbon-copy Joe Walters goals in a row--one on EMO (the only extra man score for Maryland all evening), and one from the same spot, this off a feed from Brendan Healy. They were 42 seconds apart, two-thirds of the way through the third quarter. It was now Navy 6, Maryland 5.

Eight seconds later, David Tamberrino took the next face-off and rolled right into Navy's goal with it to tie the game at 6.

Both defenses clamped down with determination. Navy's hemorrhaging had stopped, but Maryland was also stymied.

Three minutes into the final quarter, after yet another Maryland penalty, Jon Birsner came from behind the goal, looked to pass, but jumped instead and found the goal on a shot from close in on the right. It took Maryland by surprise.

Brendan Healey, who had as good a night as any Maryland player, had been relatively quiet. Healey had fed for two goals, but hadn't scored. Now he would tally twice in exactly 30 seconds. The first (9:22) was right-handed from the right side. The second (8:52) was on a left-handed high-to-low beauty. Maryland was up 8-7, with the clock having run down to a little less than three minutes left in the game.

Navy could not get it going. Finally, Graham Gill ran to the goal. Maryland had to switch off a short stick on him. Never do that. Gill backed up, found a position in the left corner of the end zone, and began his dodge to the goal, coming out front, then reversing, Gill circled the crease from behind, counter clock-wise. As he drew even with the plane of the goal, it looked like he was going to shoot--right-handed, no less. He appeared to have no angle whatsoever. The Swami's companion, Miss Bunny Bimbette, the movie star, covered her eyes. "He's not going to make it, Swami." Gill shot. Alford looked to be in perfect position on the near pipe. Gill squeezed it by the Maryland goalie just as he was knocked to the ground.

The Swami looked at the clock. 2:02. The score was tied at 8-8.

Could Navy now hold off Maryland and send it to overtime?

Navy's Iceman won the face-off--on a procedure call!. Navy took the ball to the offensive area and called time out with 1:21 showing on the scoreboard clock.

The crowd issued an audible, collective sigh. Drama of this sort is routine at Navy-Marine Corps Stadium, and, although it can involve any number of Navy players, Chris Pieczonka is somehow almost sure to figure in the mix.

This was another wild ride on the Navy roller coaster, and a familiar nervous anticipation was beginning to settle over the Navy fans for the umpteenth time this season.

Navy had apparently concocted a play to Nick Mirabito. It busted. Precious additional seconds ticked off the clock.

The fans were standing now. With under 30 seconds, Navy looked disorganized.

The ball was passed back and forth as if no one wanted it. Finally it ended up with Graham Gill, who took matters into his own hands.

Gill cut to the goal and veered to the goalie's right, after Billy Looney set a pick. He was immediately drilled by a Terp long stick. Gill fought his way around the defender, only to be battered by a short stick from the other side. It looked like it was time for Gill to cough up the ball. But, just then, Gill got off a desperate shot with his right hand. It found the net for the go-ahead score, but there were still 14 seconds left.

Haunting visions of David Tamberrino's earlier eight second goal danced through the heads of Navy's fans. Miss Bimbette covered her eyes once more.

Navy was at it again--burning the candle right down to the last drop of wax.

The tension in the stands was palpable. Everyone was standing as the noise level rose even higher.

It was into this atmosphere that the Iceman cometh. Number 24 strode onto the field, seemingly oblivious to the din of the crowd.

The whistle blew and Pieczonka came up with the ball immediately. He directed it out to the wing. Navy had possession. The clock ticked down. The game was over.

Navy had won another patented Cardiac Classic. The woman next to the Swami looked plaintively and asked, "why do they always do this?"

The Swami gave her a straight answer, "it's Navy."

A few post game notes: after the game the Swami learned that Midshipman Matt Russell was not expected to play. He twisted his ankle Wednesday before the game, and was on crutches Thursday. Russell showed an ankle wrap during the game, but looked no worse in the goal. The Swami thought he played one of his best games ever, making some spectacular saves. Navy's man-dowm defense held the Terps to just four shots and a single goal on six Maryland flags. And, at the very end of the game, Navy defender Mitch Hendler took a vicious hit from Maryland's David Tamberrino. The Swami watched the replay later. It was a hard cross-check delivered to the side of Hendler's helmet on the run. Hendler went down, perhaps unconscious, and did not move for minutes. He was eventually helped off the field. Tamberrino was flagged for a two minute penalty, but, since the collision took place with only a second left on the clock, it was not served. It's a real shame to see something like this happen in the game. Tamberrino had been whistled earlier for basically the same type of check, only it was not delivered full-force on the run. This came real close to the type of tragedy that no one likes to see in any sport. As one would expect from a player like Tamberrino, who has no reputation for behavior like this, he wasted no time in issuing profuse apologies.

Final score: Navy 9, Maryland 8
swami@laxswami.com


On the road with Northwestern...
Showdown in the Midwest: #2 Duke meets #1 Northwestern in a real battle...Miss C. C. Ryan reports from Evanston...
Northwestern is focused on its mission: bringing a championship to the Midwest for the first time...
Three reasons why No. 2 Duke can blame bad luck for its loss to No. 1 Northwestern:

1. Duke lax was just cursed this weekend in its match ups against No. 1 teams.

The Blue Devils women must have know the No. 2 Duke men's team's devastating OT loss to Johns Hopkins was a bad omen.

2. A freak incident kept starting goalie Megan Huether out of the game for six minutes.

Huether, with no NU players around her, mysteriously went down after chasing a ball behind her net – from the stands, it was impossible to tell why. After the trainer led Huether off the field, backup Regan Bosch was helpless against an inflamed NU attack, letting in three goals in six minutes before Huether returned.

3. Duke, unluckily, had No. 1 Northwestern on its schedule.

With that said, let's talk about the game. Most people were probably betting on the Blue Devils in this match, and that's kind of where I was leaning. Yes, Northwestern was ranked No. 1 and their offense was going nuts against everyone they faced on the field, but its best opponents of the season so far were No. 6 North Carolina and No. 16 Penn.

Duke, on the other hand, had beaten No. 3 Georgetown, No. 5 Virginia, No. 9 Maryland, and No. 15 William and Mary. Their only two losses were to North Carolina and No. 4 Princeton. That's a lot of numbers, but it gives a good idea of the differences between the two schedules.

Briefly, let me take back whatever I said about attendance at Northwestern's last game. The Wildcats quadrupled their attendance for this huge match up, with some help from a strong Duke contingent and a few local lacrosse teams. There was a Warriors lacrosse equipment truck promoting their stuff out in the parking lot, and someone paid for a plane to fly above the field with the message “Go Cats – Beat Duke.”

It didn't look like that banner was going to do much help at the opening face-off. If size does matter, the Cats were screwed. In almost every player match up, the Blue Devils won hands-down size-wise, and nowhere was that more apparent than at the faceoff – where the 5' 4"" Courtney Koester faced the much larger (her height is unlisted) Rachel Sanford. Sanford won the draw, and the Blue Devils quickly took it toward the NU net. Duke's Leigh Jester wasn't joking when, 1:09 in, she got the game's first goal on a free-position shot.

Duke won the second draw, and Katie Chrest made a quick feed up the field to Kristen Waagbo, who made it 2-0 only seven seconds after the first Duke goal. Northwestern was shocked into realizing they were playing the second-best team in the country– they hadn't let an opponent score first on them all season.

It only took the Wildcats only 10 seconds to answer back, though, as Aly Josephs sliced her way through the Duke defense and sent it home. The teams battled until NU's Lindsey Munday tied things up on a free-position goal.

And then things heated up for the Blue Devils. Chrest got Duke rolling when she snuck up from behind the net and NU allowed her to walk right in front of NU goaltender Ashley Gersuk. The Duke fans began stomping after the next Duke goal. Then Rachel Sanford threw a ball to the ground in front of Gersuk – it bounced in to make it 5-2 (I'm not sure if it was the ugliest goal of the game, the prettiest, or the luckiest).

The Wildcats, looking frazzled and unable to handle the Blue Devils, took a timeout. It looked like it might help, as the Cats won the next draw, but a turnover led to a Duke possession. The Cats gave them a long time to set up, and Duke's Katie Laschinger made it 6-2 on a free position shot.

This was Duke’s chance to pull away in the game, prove the Midwest was no place for a No. 1 team, and steal bragging rights back for some East Coast pride. Instead, the Blue Devils' bad luck (okay, bad defensive play) appeared, in the form of NU's Laura Glassanos, who started an 11-minute, eight-goal NU run. Munday scored and Glassanos got her second before Huenther came out and Bosch went in. Josephs, Kristen Kjellman, and Courtney Flynn scored on the backup before Huenther reappeared.

The starting goalie made some stops, but she couldn't save her stunned defense as Kjellman and Josephs made it a 10-6 game. Two minutes later, Rachel Sanford found the remote control for the NU offense and pushed “pause” to squeeze in a goal, but NU answered back three minutes later when Kristen Kjellman finished first-half scoring. The tides had turned, and NU was up 11-7.

This was the biggest comeback either team had seen all year (although Virginia put up a good fight against Duke on April 2), and each team was ready to (ready for this? pun intended) duke it out in the second half.

The Blue Devils must have found a four-leaf clover (left over from Friday's 11-8 win over the Fighting Irish) in their bags during the break, because they cut NU's lead to two in the first 2:11 of the half.

Sparks sent a perfect pass to Kristen Waagbo for the first goal, then found the net herself for the second.

NU wasn't about to let some girls in ugly navy uniforms ruin their victory tailgate, though, so they decided to keep the ball for the rest of the half (the Cats controlled possession up until the final minutes). The Blue Devils must have thought getting mean would help them. They racked up 16 fouls in the second half alone, and Meghan Ferguson got her first of two yellow cards when she collided with a wandering Gersuk.

Munday answered 27 seconds after Spark's goal, then set up Kjellman 16 seconds later. Sarah Albrecht nailed a point-blank free position shot. Sanford bounced another ball in 30 seconds later, making it 15-10. Kjellman put one in just more than 12:20 into the half, the Cats patiently hogged the ball. The Blue Devils picked up their pace with about seven minutes remaining while while they prayed for the game's second big comeback.

“Hustle Blue,” coach Kirsten Kimmel yelled from the sidelines. Spark's free position goal with 4:45 remaining was all the Blue Devils could muster though, as the NU defense's pressure and some quick saves by Gersuk held off the attack.

Sure, blame it on bad luck. Or look at the stats, which show that Northwestern has the best offense, defense, scoring margin, win percentage, draw controls, scorer, and goaltender in the country.

Final score: Northwestern 16 (plus pride), Duke 11 (minus confidence?)
ccryan@laxswami.com


In Baltimore, at Homewood Field...
Miss Venus Lee reports...
Miss Lee's comments were lost in transmission when the Swami's mail server went down for 36 hours. She is visiting the West Coast presently and will not return until Friday. We hope to have them up later.
venuslee@laxswami.com


This Week...
Lacrosse broadcast links...
Each week the Swami notices questions on the Laxpower board about which games will be broadcast that weekend. Hey, they're all here!

If you need to connect to lacrosse games on the Internet, remember: the Swami's list is the most complete compilation of lacrosse TV and radio broadcasts on the Internet. To get to that page, or any of the Swami's other exciting pages, just run your mouse over the floating link bar at the left of your screen. That will activate the pull-out tray which contains links to Radio/TV, the Swami's other links and the Swami Fan Club, which is now the most populous fan club in lacrosse. Hey, when you read the Swami, you get it all!

It usually takes a while to get down all the many changes that college stations make to their webcasts between seasons, so be patient.

The Game of the Year:

....Army at Navy

Saturday, April 16, High Noon, Navy-Marine Corps Memorial Stadium, Annapolis, MD

Listen to Pete Medhurst call the game over WNAV 1430 AM. The pre-game show begins at 11:45 AM. Click on WNAV logo.



(Game times are approximate and subject to adjustment, so check schedules for changes College radio is hit and miss, the Swami's media links may not always work.)

1. Swami's Game of the Week: Army (#6) at Navy (#7)--(Saturday, April 16, High Noon, Annapolis, MD)--TV GAME--Don't miss this game! And don't miss the alumni game that precedes it Friday night at Rip Miller Field. Enough has been said about the contest already. Suffice to say, even though this match is being televised nationally, you will never get the real feel for an Army-Navy unless you buy a ticket. There's just too much action in these games away from the ball that the camera doesn't capture. The Swami will make one prediction off the bat: this will be the highest attended Army-Navy game ever. And for good reason: these two teams are about dead even in all the rankings. There is, unfortunately, no normal barometer for who wins this battle. Face-offs, ground balls, turnovers, clears, saves, all take a second seat to the one great unquantifiable statistic: hustle. The team that doesn't hustle in this game gets run over. But, that's well known. Both teams are playing their best ball of the year. When Army comes to Annapolis the tailgates are better because the stadium is off Naval Academy grounds, thereby lessening security issues. The Swami can't say anything that has not been said already. Miss Lee likes Army for obvious reasons. The Swami takes the Mids. This game will be a rare ten barn burner--and that's a guarantee.

2. Johns Hopkins (#1) at Maryland (#8)--(Friday, April 15, 8:00 PM, College Park, MD)--TV GAME--Maryland, stung by its losses to Dartmouth and Navy, is not about to allow Hopkins to get away with its prevent offense. The Terps can be one of the most disruptive teams in Division I and Byrd Stadium is always unfriendly to the Blue Jays. The Swami thinks that this game will be determined in its waning minutes, just as it was two years ago. Stung by its loss to Navy, the Terps must bring some bedlam and disruption to the Blue Jays if they are to win this game. The Swami and Miss Lee still both like Hopkins.

3. Cornell (#10) at Dartmouth (#11)--(Saturday, April 16, 1:00 PM, Hanover, NH)--Princeton's recent loss to Rutgers now makes this game even bigger than it once was--and it was always going to be a pretty big game. Dartmouth, whose win over Maryland may just be enough to propel the Greenies into the NCAA Playoffs, would still like some insurance--like also being Ivy League Champions. Cornell's best win over Notre Dame has now been devalued by an Irish loss to Denver. With Syracuse the only top ranked team left on its schedule, Cornell is desperate for the Ivy Crown. The Big Red need this game in a big way. This contest will burn all the barns in New Hampshire, where Dartmouth will turn out some of the most rancorous fans in Division I lacrosse. This is a match-up that no one in the area should miss. Dartmouth, a decided underdog, has the strongest eleventh man in the Ivy League with its rabid fan base--and the Swami thinks they will actually be the difference in this game. The Swami says the Green triumph over the Red. The ultra-conservative Miss Lee plays it safe and takes Cornell.
4. Loyola (#13) at Georgetown (#4)--(Saturday, April 16, 1:00 PM, Washington, DC)--This game has never quite grown into the rivalry that these two schools had probably anticipated. The Swami has two ideas as to how to liven up this contest, set for the Nation's Capital. The first would be for Loyola to bring its pre-game music to Kehoe Field. That would pose an interesting dilemma for the Ultra-PC Tooner fans: to make a choice between their knee-jerk tendency to politically validate hip-hop music, as they do with any number of other pretentious pseudo-urban "cultural" phenomena, or else face the possibility that their kids might want to adopt rap's coarse language, misygonism, or, heaven forbid, its jewelry ("Hey, mom, I want a Biggie Smalls nude zodiac ring like the kids from Loyola wear"). The second idea would be for Georgetown University to associate itself with the Catholic Church so that this game could claim some sort of internecine rivalry. Of course, if Georgetown ever became Catholic, it would have to re-convert Loyola, but who sweats the small stuff? Hey, that works for the Swami. But the Swami thinks that, regardless of the vast improvement Loyola has shown this season, Georgetown is still the better team. Miss Lee agrees. Then again, only one thing is fur sure in this game: no Catholic school will win.

5. Notre Dame (#12) at Fairfield (unranked)--(Sunday April 17, 1:00 PM, Fairfield, CT)--Fairfield has been flying under everyone's radar. The Stags are not only unnoticed, but they are vastly improved from the team that lost earlier this season to Sacred Heart. This squad represents the only real threat to Denver for dominance in the GWLL. The Swami likes Fairfield to upset Notre Dame. So does Miss Lee.

6. UMass (#13) at Hobart (unranked)--(Saturday, April 16, 1:00 PM, Geneva, NY)--Both the Swami and Miss Lee like UMass.
7. North Carolina (unranked) at UMBC (unranked)--(Saturday, April 16, 1:00 PM, Baltimore, MD)--TV GAME--Last year, North Carolina won this game in Chapel Hill 17-6. The year before, however, the Tarheels visited Retriever Stadium and watched UMBC eat its boxed lunches. This season Retriever Stadium is undergoing a renovation of its field. Since it is a Maryland state school, all that can be said about the renovation is that it may be completed by 2008. The UMBC web site says only that the game will be played in "Baltimore." Ditto for UNC's site. Hey, if these two schools can't give more specific directions than that, the Swami is not going to do their job for them. In order to make the playoffs, UNC will have to finish the season with at least a .500 record. The hapless Tarheels are now 2-7, with three regular season games left on their schedule. If they win those three games, UNC can get to 7-7 by winning the ACC Tournament. But that won't happen. The Tarheels, darlings of the MSLM (mainstream lacrosse media), will be buying their tickets for the NCAA's this weekend along with the rest of the public when UMBC gives them an old-fashioned blue collar education. That's provided Air Force doesn't do it first. Miss Lee likes the 'Heels. Only one barn will be burnt in this game. If you don't like second-hand tobacco smoke, stay away.

8. Virginia (#3) at Duke (#2)--(Saturday, April 16, 3:00 PM, Durham, NC)--Will there be an upset between ACC teams at all this year? There hasn't been so far. The Swami thinks that will end this weekend. Miss Lee likes Duke after watching the Blue Devils twice. The Swami thinks Virginia travels well to North Carolina and that UVA will be top seed in the ACC's.
9. Harvard (unranked) at Princeton (unranked)--(Saturday, April 16, 3:00 PM, Princeton, NJ)--TV GAME--The Ivy League is in turmoil. Last week Princeton lost to Yale. The Eli's may be even more depleted than the Tigers. Harvard barely eked by winless Penn. And Dartmouth beat Maryland but lost to Sacred Heart. The big game this weekend is Cornell at Dartmouth, but this game will tell us if Harvard has any chance at all of rising to challenge. The Swami is inclined to think so, and picks the Crimson.  Miss Lee likes Princeton. She won't say why.
10. Rutgers (unranked) at Syracuse (#5)--(Saturday, April 16, 4:00 PM, Syracuse, NY)--TV GAME--Has Syracuse ever been upset more by any team other than Rutgers? It doesn't seem so. Close games abound in this series, but mostly when they are played in New Jersey. The 'Cuse, plagued with breaking a lot of new players into its starting lineup seems now to have things more firmly in place. Both the Swami and Miss Lee like Syracuse to win at home.

11. UMBC (unranked) at Loyola (#15)--(Tuesday, April 19, 3:00 PM, Baltimore, MD)--Hey, this will be a dog fight (no pun intended). Retrievers are much tougher than Greyhounds, but the hounds are faster. The Swami and Miss Lee both think this race goes to the swiftest. Loyola may be the single most improved team in Division I since the beginning of the season. The Greyhounds are blessed with a coach who has pushed them hard, but never given up hope for the 2005 season. His vision is now being vindicated. Loyola is the Swami's choice, and also that of Miss Lee. But why is this weekday game with another local school scheduled for a 3:00 PM start? Whoops. Is it because the neighbors don't like Loyola's music with their dinner? The battles between Loyola and it's neighbors in Guilford are legend in Baltimore. This school gets a D- in community relations. But its lacrosse team gets an A+ for gritty effort. An early slow start is difficult to overcome, but the Hounds seem to have done it.

The "Big Boyz" go at it again...
What is the "Big Boyz" system?...
Anyone can pick the winners of lacrosse games. The lacrosse boards are full of people who pick Duke over St. Andrew's every year. There are several contests going on right now where the participants will actually pick more winners than the Big Boyz. But the Big Boyz do not just pick the winners of games. The Big Boyz use a system of weighted picks, and confine their picking to the most difficult Division I games. That enables you to analyze the degree of certainty imparted with each pick--a significant difference with other competing slates of games.

Each week the Big Boyz pick the winners of an average of a dozen games. In a typical 11 game week, winners are chosen by placing between 1-11 points on a team (with no number being used twice). If that team wins, the winner receives the number of points placed on it. So, for example, in using this system, the prognosticator would place 11 points on the team he (or she) was most confidant of winning, 10 points on the second most confidant pick, down to a single point on the game that the picker thought was most in doubt. This eliminates most ties and places a premium on upset picks. It also values a picker's win/loss record relatively, thus giving little recognition to luck.

Despite this unique and difficult system, the Big Boyz are so accomplished at picking that each of the past two seasons have come down to the final game before a winner has been decided.

Get ready for Week #8!

From Swampy...
I have returned...
Hello again, readers. The reigning champ returns this week having pulled himself from the depths that only the Wombat and Swami have been know to frequent, and I am right back in the thick of the race, where I belong. Though the current state of the Division Known as "I" may be surprising, they are at least stable. What looked funny at the beginning of the season remains funny. And so we have a Top 5 that contains Duke and Army and not Syracuse or Princeton. The biggest story of this week is of course Army-Navy, an annual event in every sport the two institutions play that always draws much praise and adulation from fans. However, having been a part of the rivalry myself, I'll tell you all that the thing that fascinated me the most whenever these two met was the ability of the athletes on each team to downplay the rivalry to themselves and maintain the bigger picture of the season as a whole. Sure, they don't always sound that way in quotes, but that's the way they prepare, and I find that to be an even bigger accomplishment than focusing more on a single game.

Also of great significance this week is that Army-Navy alumni lacrosse game. A great many former stars from both sides (now the same side) will be playing and it should be a real treat. There are many alumni from these schools, as well as Air Force and Coast Guard, and in fact many other DI lacrosse institutions who are serving our country across the globe, and it's great that so many of them who have done so and are continuing to do so can still play the game they and we have grown to love.

And now, my winning picks:

1. Army @ NAVY(4): I think the Mids are still better defensively. Though their offense has been struggling, the game is at Navy-Marine Corps Memorial Stadium, where they are usually able to produce fast break and transition opportunities, a style of play they are much better suited for. Navy in a nail-biter.

2. HOPKINS @ Maryland(9): Hopkins will run the table. Maryland has no fire, and Hopkins seems to be peaking, contrary to past seasons.

3. Cornell @ DARTMOUTH(3): In case you haven't been following my picks, this is not an upset. The Big Green are that good.

4. Loyola @ GEORGETOWN(11): Loyola is the most overrated team of the 21st Century.

5. NOTRE DAME @ Fairfield(10): The Irish are the second most overrated team of the 21st Century, but will win.

6. UMASS @ Hobart(2): Minutemen are still flying below most people's radar.

7. UNC @ umbc(8): North Carolina is bad, but not worse than UMBC.

8. UVA @ Duke(5): I think Duke is an extremely good team, but I am still not confident in their coaching staff's ability to win a big game. Despite the offensive turnaround this year, they still played scared against Hopkins with the lead. UVA will win the faceoff battle and the game.

9. Harvard @ PRINCETON(7): If I keep picking them, they will win eventually.

10. Rutgers @ SYRACUSE(6): Orangemen need a late surge for seeding purposes, and they still have revenge on their minds from OT loss to Rutgers. Carrier Dome advantage plays a role.

11. umbc @ LOYOLA(1): The Greyhounds decide to play and win an interstate game.is commentary will resume next week. His picks are noted in the table.

--Swampy.


From STaTs...
STaTs is ready to blow his entire bankroll on Navy...
11. Army-Navy -- Navy (11)

No other game matters this week...not even Hopkins-Maryland (that will be a blowout anyway) or UVA-Duke. Navy and Army will BATTLE on Saturday, and the team that has more heart will win. Talent doesn't win this game, a healthy team doesn't win this game, a hot streak doesn't win this game...HEART and heart alone wins the Navy/Army game. Army's attack has 103 points. Army's first midfield has 29 points. Navy's attack has 72 points. Navy's first midfield has 51 points. Look for Navy to win this game at the midfield.

They are deep, and as the stingy Navy D (allowing only 5.7 gpg) clamps down on the Army attack, the midfielders will take over the game. Navy rules this series 50-26-3 and has a seven game winning streak. It won't be the blowout that it was last year, but surely Navy has more heart and will come out victors. BEAT ARMY!

2. Hopkins-Maryland -- Hopkins (10)

3. Cornell-Dartmouth -- Cornell (8)

4. Loyola-Georgetown -- Georgetown (9)

5. Notre Dame-Fairfield -- Notre Dame (7)

6. UMass-Hobart -- UMass (4)

7. UNC-UMBC -- UNC (2)

8. UVA-Duke -- UVA (1)

9. Harvard-Princeton -- Princeton (5)

10. Rutgers-Syracuse -- Syracuse (6)

11. UMBC-Loyola -- Loyola (3)

--STaTs.


From Glory Days...
The ACC battle for #1...
It's 8:00 PM Wednesday night and I just got back into the country to find out that the Swami needed my commentry earlier today. So, to all my loyal fans, I hope this gets in. Since I'm rushing, I won't say much other than the Virginia - Duke game should be every bit as good as last weeks Hopkins - Duke game. I've said all season that the Devils are good but the Hoos have had their number in the past and I expect that the Virginia defense will be the difference.

(5) Army - Navy - This game is always a battle especially this year with the Alumni Game but I have to go with the Cadets who have been more consistant all year.

(11) Hopkins - Maryland - The Jays are still the team to beat and the Terps are not the team that will even give them a scare.

(2) Cornell - Dartmouth - Big Red just knocked off Cuse but the Green Machine has upset some people. This game will be closer than expected but I sttill like Cornell to win the Ivy.

(9) Loyola - Georgetown - Hoyas are starting to find their stride and the Hounds have been shakey.

(7) Notre Dame - Fairfield - Every time I take the Irish they let me down but the Stags have not shown much either.

(3) UMass - Hobart - Again two up and down teams. Statesmen let me down against Penn State so I'm taking the Minutemen.

(10) UNC - UMBC - Heels have been horrible but I gotta believe they can out run the Retrievers.

(1) UVA - Duke - Are you kidding? I can't bet against my boys. This is the first big step toward meeting the Jay's for the title.

(8) Harvard - Princeton - There is no way the Tigers go 0-7.

(6) Rutgers - Syracuse - Will someone tell me what's up with the Orange? This is just gut pick. Knights could win.

(4) UMBC - Loyola - Pick um. Two teams going nowhere..

--Glory Days


From American Iron Horse...
The Horse is on the road, but mailed this in...
ARMY-1

JHU-2

COR-3

GT-4

ND-5

HOB-6

UMBC-7

DUKE-8

HAR-9

RUT-10

LOY-11.

--AIH out.


From goygoy 21...